22 Sep Assignment 8.1: Concept Analysis Using Walker and
Assignment 8.1: Concept Analysis Using Walker and Avant Method – Part 2 Small Group Discussion Points: 60 Directions: This week you will complete and submit the concept analysis which will include the first part of the paper edited from the feedback you received Week 7. Then the development of the model, borderline, related, contrary, invented and illegitimate, identify antecedents and consequences, define empirical referents, final definitions, and the reference list. This section will complete the group activity. Steps to Complete Part 2: Identify a model case. A model case is a real-life example of the use of the concept that includes all the critical attributes of the concept (defining attributes identified in part 1 of the assignment). The model case can come first, or be developed simultaneously with the attributes, or can emerge after the attributes are tentatively determined. Identify borderline, related, contrary, invented, and illegitimate cases. Borderline case: contains some of the critical attributes but not all of them. Related case: related to the concept but does not contain the critical attributes Contrary case: not the concept. Invented case: constructed, but not existing in real life. Illegitimate case: improper use of the concept. Identify antecedents and consequences. Antecedents; events that must occur prior to the occurrence of the concept. Consequences: events that occur because of the occurrence of the concept Define empirical referents. Referents will be classes or categories of actual phenomena that by their existence of presence demonstrated the occurrence of the concept. These are both direct and indirect. Empirical references are useful in instrument development and in contributing to content and construct validity of any new instrument. Conclude the paper with a brief summary and a theoretical and operational definition. Adapted from: Concept analysis: Examining the state of the science (PDF) (Links to an external site.) Walker, L.O., & Avant, K., (2005). Strategies for theory construction in nursing (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Refer to all generic role assignments by reviewing the Small Group Discussion Overview and Assignment within Week 1. Similarity Score After submitting your assignment, select Submission Details to view your similarity score. Your similarity score will appear as a percentage next to your submitted file. It may take up to 24 hours for your similarity score to appear. Rubric Assignment 7.1: Concept Analysis Using Walker and Avant Method Rubric Part 2 Assignment 7.1: Concept Analysis Using Walker and Avant Method Rubric Part 2 Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Develop model, borderline, related, contrary, invented, and illegitimate cases according to Walker & Avant’s Model 20.0 pts Ideas are original and are clearly stated 16.0 pts All cases developed with partial criteria meet according to the model 10.0 pts Cases partially developed 2.0 pts Concept, model, and purpose not clearly defined 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Clearly identified antecedents and consequences according to Walker & Avant’s Model 10.0 pts Antecedents and consequences concept clearly stated according to the model 8.0 pts Antecedents and consequences of the concept stated 6.0 pts Antecedents and consequences of the concept partially stated 2.0 pts No clear identification of antecedents and consequences 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Define empirical referents according to Walker& Avant’s model 10.0 pts Clearly presented empirical referents related to the concept 8.0 pts Empirical referents identified 6.0 pts Empirical referents partially identified 2.0 pts No clear identification of empirical referents related to the concept 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Clearly stated an operational definition and a summary conclusion 10.0 pts Clearly stated an operational definition and a summary conclusion 8.0 pts Operational definition and summary conclusion identified 6.0 pts Operational definition and summary conclusion partially identified 2.0 pts No clear operational definition and a summary conclusion 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Correct APA formatting for title page, in-text citations and reference list 10.0 pts Appropriate APA formatting throughout the paper 8.0 pts APA formatting used (>50% of the paper) 6.0 pts APA formatting used <50% of the paper 2.0 pts APA formatting not used 10.0 pts Total Points: 60.0 Previous
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
If you are looking for the most professional Company that confidentially produces the highest quality research and writing, we are your perfect source. We will offer you 100% ORIGINAL WRITING WITH FREE REVISIONS. All our papers are written from scratch.
How to Order
Click place order to open our order form.
Fill in paper details correctly and pay
Receive your plagiarism free paper as per your set deadline